Obstructions to combinatorial formulas for plethysm

Motivated by questions of Mulmuley and Stanley we investigate quasi-polynomials arising in formulas for plethysm. We demonstrate, on the examples of $S^3(S^k)$ and $S^k(S^3)$, that these need not be counting functions of inhomogeneous polytopes of dimension equal to the degree of the quasi-polynomial. It follows that these functions are not, in general, counting functions of lattice points in any scaled convex bodies, even when restricted to single rays. Our results also apply to special rectangular Kronecker coefficients.Comment: 7 pages; v2: Improved version with further reaching counterexamples; v3: final version as in Electronic Journal of Combinatoric

Plethysm and lattice point counting

We apply lattice point counting methods to compute the multiplicities in the plethysm of $GL(n)$. Our approach gives insight into the asymptotic growth of the plethysm and makes the problem amenable to computer algebra. We prove an old conjecture of Howe on the leading term of plethysm. For any partition $\mu$ of 3,4, or 5 we obtain an explicit formula in $\lambda$ and $k$ for the multiplicity of $S^\lambda$ in $S^\mu(S^k)$.Comment: 25 pages including appendix, 1 figure, computational results and code available at http://thomas-kahle.de/plethysm.html, v2: various improvements, v3: final version appeared in JFoC

Generic and special constructions of pure O-sequences

It is shown that the h-vectors of Stanley-Reisner rings of three classes of matroids are pure O-sequences. The classes are (a) matroids that are truncations of other matroids, or more generally of Cohen-Macaulay complexes, (b) matroids whose dual is (rank + 2)-partite, and (c) matroids of Cohen-Macaulay type at most five. Consequences for the computational search for a counterexample to a conjecture of Stanley are discussed.Comment: 16 pages, v2: various small improvements, accepted by Bulletin of the London Math. Societ